Read this story and then consider the headline.
It rather weakens one's case against the sort of hysteria the piece is attacking when one frames the story so falsely in one's headline.
Forty-Four Years in French Academia—And Why It’s All Gone Wrong
-
Editor’s Note: The following article was originally published by
the Observatory of University Ethics on July 12, 2025. The Observatory
translated it int...
15 minutes ago
Yeah, well, Bill Muehlenberg. What do you expect? I think he needs an introduction to this concept:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=squick
BM is a bit of a specimen.
ReplyDeleteLove the definition of 'squick', thanks. But the religious are often impressed by disgust: or even defined by it. The disgust that many Muslims have for dogs as "unclean" animals is a case in point. (Itself a brand-differentiation from Zoroastrianism, which thought dogs particularly noble beasts.)